Who Am I? What’s My Name?

R1b-L21 Descendant Tree borrowed from the 'R L21, Z290 and Subclades FamilyTreeDNA Project'

R1b-L21 Descendant Tree borrowed from the ‘R L21, Z290 and Subclades FamilyTreeDNA Project’
(click to enlarge)

For a number of years I’ve believed my patrilineal line (my Hibbitt ancestors) dated back to the early 18th century, being located in the village of Exton in the county of Rutland. However, recent DNA discoveries have thrown this into question.

The records I’ve looked at to date show no sign of a problem but it’s looking likely that my family has a NPE (non-paternal event) or misattributed parentage. How do I know this?

I recently started a Facebook Group called Hibbitt/Hibbett (plus other variants) Family History Research Group. There are a number of people in this group who descend from a John HIBBIT & Mary Toft who married in St Pancras, London, in 1770. One member, who is a direct male line descendant of this couple, ran his father’s AncestryDNA test through the Morley Y-SNP Subclade Predictor Tool and received a basic haplogroup of R1b-Z2534.

My dad knows his current haplogroup (R1b-Z36747), having taken a number of Y-DNA tests. It can be written as a series of subclades moving forward in time as various mutations arise:
R1b-M343 > P297 > M269 > L23 > L51 > P312 > Z290/S461 > L21 > DF13 > DF21 > S3058 > S424 > S426 > CTS2187/S190 > Z36747

Unfortunately, the Z2534 haplogroup split away from my dad’s haplogroup at DF13, a haplogroup which was formed in approximately 2600 BC. The path is:
R1b-M343 > P297 > M269 > L23 > L51 > P312 > Z290/S461 > L21 > DF13 > Z253 > Z2534

Therefore my dad and the descendant of John HIBBIT (m. 1770) cannot share a recent patrilineal ancestor.

At this point I wasn’t too concerned as paper records haven’t connected the London HIBBIT family to the Rutland HIBBITT/HIBBETT family. I was therefore keen to hear from descendants of my most distant known ancestor (MDKA), John Hybit, who married three times in Exton between 1712 and 1732.

I believed I was descended through John HYBIT’s son, William, and so I was pleased to discover that a descendant of John’s son, Matthew, had received his AncestryDNA results. He too was a direct male line descendant and very kindly ran his DNA through the Morley Tool. It turns out that he too, received a result of R1b-Z2534.

The conclusion to be drawn from this is that the London HIBBIT group and the Rutland HIBBITT/HIBBETT group share a distant ancestor dating back to about 4600 years ago, give or take a few centuries either way. The likelihood is that if they were to undertake dedicated Y-DNA testing, they would probably find that their common ancestor is much more recent than this and they would also be eligible to join the R-Z253 Project at FamilyTreeDNA.

Unfortunately for me and my close family, it is looking very likely that we are the odd-ones-out. However, I would still be glad if additional, suitable candidates would ascertain their haplogroup so we can be more certain of the facts and to perhaps narrow down precisely in which generation the NPE occurred.

[UPDATE: since I first posted, a few more men with similar surnames to ours have ascertained their haplogroup which confirmed a recent connection between themselves, leaving us very much out on our own – see more about this here. Dad’s haplogroup has been further refined and is now R-Y85420. We still await closer DNA matches to help us solve the mystery of what our surname might be.]

Posted in DNA | Tagged , , , | (Leave a comment)


A Tale Of Tragedy

Matthew Hibbit was born in about 1735, the second son of my 6 x great-grandparents, and he married Frances Penruddock in St Peter & St Paul’s Church, Exton, Rutland, on 13th November 1758. I decided to take a look at Frances’ family and, not for the first time, I stumbled across a great deal of tragedy.

Frances was the sixth of eight children born to Richard and Dorothy Penruddock between 1722 and 1737 in Pilton in Rutland. Richard died in December 1739 when Frances was barely six years old.

Her mother remarried in January 1741. Her second husband was a farmer called John Deacon who I discovered was dead two months later. Dorothy must have been pregnant with John’s child when they married as John junior was baptised on 29th April 1741. Worse still, Dorothy was buried on the same day. What a start in life for that poor baby and all of his half siblings.

AI Generated image depicting the Great Frost of 1739/40

AI Generated image depicting the Great Frost of 1739/40

Much of Europe suffered severely cold weather during the winter of 1739/40.  In Ireland, which was particularly hit, this became known as the Great Frost. The streets of London were clogged with snow and ice and the River Thames was frozen for about eight weeks. This was followed by more cold weather and severe gales affecting shipping and one of the worst dry spells of the 18th century which resulted in famine and disease.

The period 1740-1743 has been shown to be the driest period of the last 280 years, with the year 1740 the coldest recorded over the British Isles since comparable records began in 1659. One can only wonder whether the Penruddock/Deacon families living in Rutland were affected by these adverse conditions too?

[UPDATE: since I first posted, DNA results have shown that my own Hibbitt line does not stretch back as far as the family in Rutland and therefore, I do not have a genetic link to Matthew Hibbit.]

Posted in Ancestors Corner | Tagged , , | (Leave a comment)


Latest On Our Hibbitt Y-DNA Kits

My dad’s Y STR test has recently been upgraded to 111 markers. However, as I thought might be the case, he doesn’t yet have any matches at this level. This would be because the right men haven’t yet taken the test. Hopefully we shall have some men who are descended from John Hybit of Exton, Rutland, testing in the future and then we may begin to discern which markers are related to which branches of the family.

Z36747 men on The Big Tree

Z36747 men on Alex Williamson’s ‘The Big Tree’

In the meantime, Alex Williamson has begun updating ‘The Big Tree’. Initially dad’s kit was placed with another kit whose ancestor was called Doggart. However, a new Big Y kit (Chism) has recently arrived and formed a new subclade below Z36747 with Doggart. Dad now sits alone at Z36747 until any closer matches appear.

[UPDATE June 2025: since I first posted, my Dad’s subclade has moved down one place from Z36747 to Y85420. After ascertaining DNA results from other men with similar surnames to ours and, in conjuction with analysing dad’s autosomal test, it turns out that we are not Hibbitts further back than a few generations – you can read about my discovery here. He still does not have any close matches at the 111 marker level to help us solve the mystery of what our surname might be.]

Posted in DNA | Tagged | (Leave a comment)


How To Obtain A Y-DNA Haplogroup From An Autosomal DNA Test For Free

The Morley Y-SNP Subclade Predictor Tool showing my dad's estimated haplogroup

The Morley Y-SNP Subclade Predictor Tool showing my dad’s estimated haplogroup
(click to enlarge)

If you are male and have taken an AncestryDNA, 23andMe or MyHeritage autosomal DNA test, it may be possible to extract some Y-DNA data from your DNA file to obtain an estimated haplogroup. I should emphasize that this isn’t a substitute for a dedicated Y-DNA test but it might be useful in pointing you in the right direction for further testing or to see whether you are likely to match with others who share your surname.

It’s free to use the Morley Y-SNP Subclade Predictor Tool at https://ytree.morleydna.com/extractFromAutosomal. All you need to do is download your raw data file from one of the three testing companies mentioned above and run it through the tool so there’s nothing to stop you having a go. It’s very easy to do. There are limitations in that the SNP needs to be present in the Morley tool and in your autosomal DNA test which is why you will only get a basic haplogroup.

This link provides instructions on how to use your AncestryDNA kit with the Morley Tool. [Note the original web page is no longer live on the internet so this link takes you to a copy of the page via the Internet Archives’ Wayback Machine. Please be patient while the page loads.]

My dad took the Big Y test at FamilyTreeDNA which gave him a current terminal SNP of Z36747 which can be written as…

R1b-M343 > P297 > M269 > L23 > L51 > P312 > Z290/S461 > L21 > DF13 > DF21 > S3058 > S424 > S426 > CTS2187/S190 > Z36747

Before ordering Big Y, using my dad’s AncestryDNA kit and the Morley Tool, my dad’s haplogroup was reported as S190. You can see therefore that he made it quite a way down the Y phylogenetic (or evolutionary) tree towards his terminal SNP by simply using his autosomal test.

Likewise, my husband, Harvey, has recently ordered a Big Y test but he’s undertaken some SNP testing in the past to give him a subclade of S18890 which can be written as…

R1b-M343 > P297 > M269 > L23 > L51 > U106 > L48 > Z9 > Z30 > Z2 > Z7 > Z8 > Z338 > Z11 > Z12 > Z8175 > FGC12057 > S18890*

The Morley Tool gave him a haplogroup of Z12 which is how I knew to order the L48 SNP Panel at YSEQ. The Big Y will supersede this SNP Panel when the results are back and he might even end up further downstream of the S18890 SNP.

—————————–

[UPDATE June 2025: since I first posted, more men have tested their Y-DNA at FamilyTreeDNA and now my dad’s terminal SNP is Y85420 and Harvey’s is BY100453.

The full path to my dad’s terminal SNP is now being presented as…

R-M207 > M173 > M343 > L754 > L761 > L389 > P297 > M269 > L23 > L51 > P310 > L151 > P312 > Z290 > L21 > S552 > DF13 > DF21 > FGC3213 > ZZ1_1 > S3058 > S424 > S426 > CTS2187 > FGC3215 > Z36747 > Y85420

And the full path to Harvey’s terminal SNP is now being presented as…

R-M207 > M173 > M343 > L754 > L761 > L389 > P297 > M269> L23 > L51 > P310 > L151 > U106 > Z2265 > BY30097 > FTT8 > Z381 > Z301 > L48 > Z9 > Z30 > Z27 > Z345 > Z2 > Z7 > Z31 > Z8 > Z338 > Z11 > Z341 > Z12 > Z8175 > FTB34754 > FGC12057 > S18890 > FT161969 > BY116091 > BY137021 > BY112552 > BY100453
(See more on Harvey’s Y-DNA at this link.)]

Posted in DNA | Tagged , | (Leave a comment)


Finding More Kidderminster Ancestors

I’ve made a little progress on my Worcestershire based ancestors. I was aware that my 4 x great-grandmother was Elizabeth Lewis who married Samuel Cotterell at Kidderminster, in 1782. I have now found her baptism dated 4th February 1757 showing that she was the daughter of Richard and Mary Lewis. Mary’s maiden name was Rook/Rooke/Rooks.

Mary Rooke was born in approximately 1734, the daughter of Thomas Rook and Sarah Payton who married in Kidderminster on 30th May 1726.

The eldest of four, Elizabeth Lewis appears to have been Richard and Mary’s only daughter. Two sons, who were probably twins, were baptised on 23rd October 1759 but sadly William died on the 24th and Francis on the 25th. This was also the day both boys were buried. Their youngest son, named Richard after his father, was baptised in October 1760, less than three months after Mary’s husband had died so life must have been tough for her.

The Payton surname was prevalent in Kidderminster from as early as the beginning of the 17th century when an Elizabeth Payton was baptised in 1620. The Rooke name appears in the town just a little later.

Kidderminster is known for the manufacture of carpets, which began during the 18th century and developed out of a well established cloth industry. I don’t know what my Lewis, Rooke and Payton forebears did for a living but I do know that Samuel Cotterell was a weaver so I think it very likely he was connected to one of these industries.

Samuel Cotterell's name and occupation as recorded on his son, Edmund's, marriage certificate

Samuel Cotterell’s name and occupation
as recorded on his son, Edmund’s, marriage certificate

Posted in Ancestors Corner | Tagged , , , , , | (Leave a comment)